//
you're reading...
Uncategorized

Drone use can put firms at risk beyond their knowledge

Using drones on construction projects, while convenient, also comes with risk.

The use of drones in the planning, design, and evaluation of the construction of a capital asset continues to evolve. Often, such usage is by inexperienced operators who lack both knowledge of and respect for the legal and practical aspects of drone use. There are many issues professional service firms need to confront if they intend to use drone photographs and videos in a lawful and effective manner.

Experienced photographers know that when they take pictures of a site or project from a plane or helicopter with an approved flight pattern, an approved crane or tower position, or an adjacent facility that they have entered legally, they need to focus only on the scope of their photography assignment. That is not always the case with drone operators—there are many drone operators who do not respect the privacy of individuals. While Americans are constantly ceding their personal privacy through various technologies, there are still tort laws in place that protect the privacy and confidentiality of individuals and businesses.

Professional service firms have to be aware that the use of drones is not a simple transition in the process of observing the work on a project site. As with web cameras, drone cameras often produce far more images than are used in the evaluation of a project. If not properly denoted in a contract, the scope of the firm’s services could include the use of all the available images as part of the firm’s duty to observe and evaluate the project as part of construction contract administration duties.

Additionally, while licensed drone operators are undoubtedly careful about having general liability insurance that protects others from their negligence in aerial activities, and follow the FAA’s rules and guidelines, many firms using drone photography are doing so as amateurs. Turning hobby activities into commercial uses is likely to be unlawful, dangerous, and uninsured.

As the FAA continues to refine the rules and processes for lawful use of drones and state and local governments enact controlling laws and identification requirements, it is likely that the future use of drones in design and construction will increase and the risks to the operators and the public decrease. But ignorance of or indifference to the many exposures faced in drone operations will only make drone operators targets for future litigation and possible criminal sanctions.

Discussion

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: a/e Pronet | Drones: Should Architects & Engineers use them? - February 25, 2016

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: